source: Copyright © 2006 Rocky Mountain News
Christo 'Over the River' proposal rolls slowly on course
By Mary Voelz Chandler, Rocky Mountain News
August 12, 2006
CAÑON CITY - One year after the Over the River project moved back into the spotlight, it is still very much a proposal.
Over the River, which began in 1992, next will be the subject of an exhaustive environmental impact statement, to be filed with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
The bottom line: Artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude want to hang 750 polypropylene panels in eight sections over 6.9 miles of the Arkansas River between Salida and Cañon City. They estimate 250,000 people would visit the valley to view the work.
"We're being very cautious," said Roy L. Masinton, manager of the BLM's Royal Gorge Field Office. "The ball primarily is in their court. They need to get us the complete proposal."
When all the documents are in place, Masinton will make the decision about whether the project will go forward.
A year ago, some hoped the artists could install the fabric panels for two weeks sometime in July or August 2008. Now, the artists say the earliest it could happen would be that time period in 2010. And that would be if their projection of completing the all-important environmental impact statement happens by next August.
The couple is familiar with waiting: Their last art installation, The Gates in New York's Central Park, took more than two decades to gain approval - and cost more than $21 million.
It hasn't always taken that long. Their last art installation in Colorado, the two-time attempt to stretch a huge swath of orange fabric between cliffs in Rifle, took 28 months. The second Valley Curtain lasted only 28 hours, ripped down by a fierce wind. It cost about $700,000. But those more simple days are long, long gone.
So far, Over the River has cost between $3.5 million and $4 million, said Jonita Davenport, the project director for this effort and for The Gates.
"Each one of our projects all cost the same thing," said Jeanne-Claude of the inevitable question of a potential price tag for Over the River, during an interview before an Aug. 5 slide show here in conjunction with an exhibition of their work.
"Everything we have and everything we are able to borrow from the bank."
Project engineer Vince Davenport added: "With this project, they're going to go to two banks."
Since last August, Jonita Davenport estimated the artists had been to Cañon City 15 times, her husband more. The team estimates it has walked the river 12 different times.
"We want to provide the most thorough process," said project engineer Vince Davenport. "Every issue must be addressed."
A month ago the team, with its consultants and various specialists and agency representatives, conducted an anchor test on a stretch of private property on the banks of the Arkansas.
An actual survey of the entire stretch of river for precise mapping is to begin this week. Up until now, the artists and their project managers have been working from photographs to decide where panels will be placed around what they term "interruptions." That could be a rock, a tree, a spot where bighorn sheep gather or where they've been warned traffic can be dangerous.
"We can see every tree and every rock," said Vince Davenport.
The BLM's Masinton said that since a trio of scoping meetings in January, his agency has received about 1,500 public comments. The first batch they read, about 1,100 in all, ran about 60 percent con, 40 percent pro.
Opposition has surfaced from the group Rags Over the Arkansas River (ROAR) that draws strength from the population along the river. A Salida-based group, Friends of Over the River, also is observing the project.
Jonita and Vince Davenport "are in touch on a fairly regular basis" and the artists "stop in every time they are in town," said Masinton. The BLM considers its work on Over the River a 100 percent reimbursable project, and has billed the artists about $102,000 since last August.
The agencies with a say in whether Over the River flies range from the Department of Transportation to the Department of Natural Resources. Those that choose to become "participating agencies" will have a "seat at the table."
Ultimately, though, "we still have the final decision," Masinton said of the BLM. Which is why he has not attended their exhibition or any of their talks.
"I need to try to maintain an unbiased position with them. I need to make a decision based on the impact on and the appropriate use of public land."
The artists say there is no way to compare this process to that of any of their other projects. "Each one is so different," said Jeanne-Claude.
Here, it's a matter of convincing federal, state, county and municipal agencies - and a population that is torn by an essentially rural project.
During the Umbrellas, Japan-USA, 1984-1991, where the artists placed 1,340 blue umbrellas in Japan and 1,760 yellow umbrellas in California, the couple had to woo rice farmers on one coast and ranchers on another to allow the giant objects to sprout on their land.
"We had to explain to 475 rice-field farmers, who don't speak English," Jeanne Claude began.
"Who said they didn't want anything religious there," added Christo. "The Mormons had tried to convert them."